TITLE (EDIT) On Proletarian Dictatorship And Islamism
DESCRIPTION
Early Islam, which revival at modern level is advocated by revolutionaries-Islamists, was proletarian dictatorship at primitive, rudimentary level [1,309 words]
AUTHOR'S OTHER TITLES (21) About The Slander Of Proletarian Dictatorship (Essays) At imperialist stage the states of 2 types are possible – bourgeois dictatorship and proletarian one. Taliban is the example of proletarian dictatorship. [459 words] Afghan Revolution And Russian Imperialism (Essays) Odious regime of police batons and lying clerical sermons, which rules over Russia today, is supported exactly by the plunder of colonies: by Chechen, Kazakh and Uzbek oil, Turkmen gas and Tajik blood [2,070 words] [Publishing] Charlie Post. The Labor Aristocracy Myth (Essays) If the theory of labor aristocracy is a “myth”, why become necessary for Post to refute it 85 years later? The rise of topicality of this theory already says that it is not “myth” [5,078 words] [Publishing] Chechen Revolution And Russian Imperialism (Essays) - [1,922 words] [Publishing] Events In Georgia And Communists’ Response (Essays) It is no reason for us, proletarians of the rich nations, to lose heart and to sob: “Oh, when will revolution occur?”. We coolly, with patience (although our fists are clenched through the impudence o... [2,598 words] [Publishing] Forgotten Names Of Comintern (Essays) - [5,006 words] [Publishing] From What Is To Begin? (Essays) Let us recollect Lenin’s idea of the formation of the party. The essence of this idea is the creation of the restricted solid core of professional revolutionaries, which connected through several inte... [1,323 words] [Publishing] L.B. Some Preliminary Thoughts About Modern Class Structure (Essays) The main advantages of the article of L.B.: 1) Rather exact answer to the question: “What is proletariat today?”, correct views on proletariat and labor aristocracy in superpowers – views, which coinc... [2,307 words] [Publishing] Leninism Or Stalinism? (Essays) Both Trotskyism and Stalinism are vulgarizations of Leninism [988 words] [Publishing] Manifesto Of The Russian Party Of Bolsheviks (Essays) Opportunism of official communist parties compelled us, Russian Bolsheviks, to create our own party. [4,151 words] [Publishing] Maudoodi About Democracy In Early Islam (Essays) Early Islam was democracy. But it is different even from modern democracy, i.e. from bourgeois democracy. Nor it was monarchy, nor oligarchy, nor theocracy. It was proletarian democracy (even if at pr... [463 words] [Publishing] Review. Abdi Tauhid. Islam Is Left-Wing In Fact (Essays) This article confirms our conclusion that early Islam, like Marx’ writings, can serve as fundamental principle of modern proletarian ideology [2,142 words] [Publishing] Revolution In The Middle East (Essays) What are the prospects of the revolution in Arab world? What sort of a revolution is this? What is the role of “Islamic factor”? [2,447 words] [Publishing] Revolution In Ukraine (Essays) What takes place in Ukraine today is the beginning of revolution in Russia (even if revolution in Russia will occur after long time) [772 words] [Publishing] The Break-Up Of Ussr: Collapse Of Socialism Or Collapse Of The Old Colonialism? (Essays) Soviet Union was not Socialist state, it was colonial empire, and its collapse was the replacement of the old colonialism by neocolonialism. [1,989 words] [Publishing] The Letter To Maoist Internationalist Movement (Essays) Mentioning only the USA as the super-power and hushing up about Russia, about China, you act in favor of imperialist competitors of USA, i.e., in favor of Russian imperialism, Chinese imperialism and ... [521 words] [Publishing] The Review. Muhammad Shiddiq Al Jawi. The Concept Of Civil Society In Islamic Perspective (Essays) “The answer which Islam proposes” which Al Jawi gives is in fact Islamized socialism, socialism in Islamic form [3,679 words] [Publishing] The Split At Tahrir Square (Essays) The demands of “secular” opposition are limited to partial reforms within the framework of the old bourgeois system. The demand of Shariah and Islamic state means in fact the demand of radical breakin... [1,512 words] What Is Proletariat? (Essays) The questions of Islamism, of what is proletariat today and what forms and methods of the struggle of proletariat must be today, are interrelated and are of practical significance [4,236 words] [Publishing] Youssef Girard. Tan Malakka : Nationalism, Marxism And Islam (Essays) Soviet-Russian opportunism kept silence about Tan Malakka who was the founder and the first chairman of Indonesian Communist Party. Why?Because he argued that alliance with Pan-Islamism is necessary. [1,248 words] [Publishing] “Communist” Tyulkin Criticizes Bourgeois Authority For Insufficiency Of Nationalism (Essays) Today official "communists" (i.e. in fact opportunists) became even more nationalistic than bourgeoisie [305 words] [Publishing]
On Proletarian Dictatorship And Islamism Alexander Gachikus
Indonesian communist Tan Malaka, about whom I wrote more than once (see my translation of Girard’s article about him, also “Forgotten names of Comintern…”), wrote in his work “Philosophy of Life” (1948) (see Tan Malaka Archive, chapter The Appearance of the State's Collapse) about the initial stage of social development - “primitive communism”:
“The condition of a society of this kind was apparently characterized by Engels as the self-acting armed organization of the population [in English in original]. Such an armed society acting on its own initiative is found in societies based upon ancient communism (“primitive communism”)”
And later:
“In passing I only wish to suggest here that, according to the evidence I have come across, Arab society in the time of the Prophet Muhammad and the three subsequent khalifas [caliphs], Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman, also existed at the stage whose basis was the “self-acting armed organization of the population”. Only after the subjugation of several very rich states like Syria and others by the Muslims did Muslim society split into two classes, those with property and the propertyless. The contradiction between the propertied and the propertyless sharpened all the more every day and could not be tranquillized. Along with the ever-continuing exacerbation of this contradiction the more power became concentrated in the hands of the khalifa and his family and assistants. The “self-acting armed organization of the population” based on collective deliberation in the time of the Prophet and the three following khalifas finally changed in the long run to become one state, one monarchy [in English in original]. The Islamic monarchies often enjoyed public prosperity and justice, such as in Muslim Spain under the government of Abd-ar-Rahman, the Baghdad monarchy under the Khalifa Harun al Rashid and the monarchy of Muslim Hindustan under Sultan Akbar. But often also the Islamic states (monarchies) suffered misery and oppression when the Khalifa, the army, the police, the judges and the executioners acted arbitrarily”
So, initial, early Islam – Islam of three earliest “righteous” (as Islamists call them) caliphs – was the “self-acting armed organization of the population”, was classless society, “primitive communism”. Moreover, this “primitive communism” of early Islam society would be incorrectly to confuse with primitive (in the sense “primeval”) communism properly, because the level of social and economic development under early Islam was relatively high - in the case of early Islam society it would be more precisely to say “rudimentary communism”, rather than “primitive communism”; also one should not forget that early Islam society was forewent by social revolution under the leadership of Mohammed. Incidentally, the translator of that work wrote at Translator's Introduction:
“Our current knowledge of pre-Islamic society in Arabia suggests that class differentiation was already quite far advanced in Muhammad's lifetime and was, in fact, a prime factor which impelled his ministry”
I.e. before Mohammed’s revolution the society was class one, but after that revolution the society became classless one, and it continued during three earliest caliphs.
So, what the “self-acting armed organization of the population” under three earliest caliphs was? Generally speaking, what is the “self-acting armed organization of the population”, if the matter concerns not primitive communal stage? It is the proletarian dictatorship. So, early Islam, which revival at modern level is advocated by revolutionaries-Islamists (talibs, revolutionaries of North Caucasus, post-Soviet Central Asia and the like), was not feudal-theocratic state, not monarchy (it became such later), as imperialist yes-men under the masks of “Marxists” lie, but just proletarian dictatorship at primitive, rudimentary (comparatively to the present time, but not to its time) level. Reading Tan Malaka’s words about “the “self-acting armed organization of the population” based on collective deliberation [emphasized by me – A. G.] in the time of the Prophet and the three following khalifas” one should recall Lenin’s words:
“It is time to discard all bourgeois hypocrisy in discourses on the people’s strength. By bourgeois definition, the strength is when masses go to the slaughter blindly, obeying the order of imperialist governments. Bourgeoisie recognize a state as strong only when the state can throw masses by the whole power of its government machinery in the direction, where bourgeois rulers want. Our notion of the strength is different. Our notion is that the state is strong by the consciousness of masses. It is strong when masses know everything, can judge everything and do everything consciously, deliberately” [Lenin, Complete works (Russian-language edition), 5th edition, 35th volume, p. 21]
How markedly it differs from modern official “Islam” (“KGB-Islam”) – from “Islam” of Gaynutdin (one of official Islam clergy’s leader) and Ramzan Kadyrov (President of Chechnya), who demand the blind obedience the authorities, President and so on for the reason that Islam, as they said, demand the obedience elders, father and so on. How closer to initial Islam’s spirit (and to Leninism’s spirit) was the founder of Jamaat-e-Islam – party, which was labeled as “terrorist” by Federal Security Service – Pakistani Mawlan Mawdudi, who wrote in the appeal to women that Muslim woman (girl) can and must disobey father, elder brother, husband, if he takes the side imperialists.
Few words about Tan Malaka. It is written the introduction to his other work (“Gerpolek”), which was published in Europe by Trotskyites:
“…the booklet of Tan Malakka is limited to the problems of the anti-colonialist struggle in Indonesia. The international problems are only touched on, and only directly concerning the questions of the Indonesian revolution. That is why Tan Malakka does not deal with the question of Stalinism and just limits himself to some general observations. But when he deals with concrete positions, he each time differentiates himself in a very clearly from Stalinist positions”
Indeed, there are some mistakes in Tan Malaka’s writings – for instance, he considered USSR as socialist state. But those mistakes were excusable for him, as it was excusable for Lenin, that he almost didn’t criticize Kautsky before 1914, although Rosa Luxemburg and others already criticized Kautsky fully at that time. Lenin concerned himself mainly with Russia (like Tan Malaka with Indonesia), but when Kautsky’s opportunist deviations had concrete consequences for Russian revolutionary movement, Lenin “differentiated himself in a very clearly from Kautskyist positions” long before 1914, as early as at the time of splitting between Bolsheviks and Mensheviks.
Last, let’s consider one more matter. In his work “Philosophy of Life” Tan Malaka mentioned Mu'tazilites – medieval reformers in Islam, who have came to atheism (according to Malaka, Ibn Rushd (Averroes), who was mentioned by M. N. Roy in his work “Historical role of Islam” (see my work “Forgotten names of Comintern…”), also was Mu'tazilite – but other authors asserts that he wasn’t). Nabhani also mentioned them (he call them Al-Mu’tazilah) in his work “Thought” (see my review of that work). But Nabhani speak negatively of them – he says that they littered Islamic philosophy with mistakes of Greek philosophers. What Mu'tazilites were in fact? What was their role? (This matter have practical significance today too, it is discussed among different Islamist trends). Apparently, their role was similar to the role of “democrats” in Russia at “Perestroika”. Just as “democrats” overthrew old CPSU regime, but “threw out the child along with the bath”, i.e. discarded Marxism-Leninism along with CPSU regime, and adopted Western liberal ideas uncritically, Mu'tazilites apparently opposed old Islam, which transformed from revolutionary ideology into reactionary one during several centuries (like official “Marxism-Leninism” in USSR), but they adopted Greek philosophy uncritically, along with its shortcomings (disregard of experience and of experiment).
Thus, Tan Malaka, not Nabhani was right in that matter: Mu'tazilites were progressive current in general, in spite of their shortcomings.
Incidentally, Nabhani made similar mistake about the collapse of Ottoman Empire at 1924. He didn’t understand progressiveness of that collapse and naively considered Ottoman Empire of early XX century as remainder of the early Caliphate (like Russian “communists” weep for USSR, naively considering it as the child of Marxism-Leninism).
December 19th, 2010
A. G.
Submit Your Review for On Proletarian Dictatorship And Islamism
Required fields are marked with (*). Your e-mail address will not be displayed.
Submit Your Rating for On Proletarian Dictatorship And Islamism